JUPITER SEA & AIR SERVICES PVT. LTD, EGMORE – CHENNAI, INDIA.

 

E-MAIL : Robert.sands@jupiterseaair.co.in   Mobile : +91 98407 85202

 

 

Corporate News Letter for  Monday  April 20,  2026


Today’s Exchange Rates

CURRENCY

PRICE

CHANGE

%CHANGE

OPEN

PREV.CLOSE

DAY's LOW-HIGH

USD/INR

92.92

0.290001

0.311126

92.94

93.21

92.655- 92.9825

EUR/USD

1.1762

-0.0019

0.161273

1.1781

1.1781

1.1761- 1.1849

GBP/INR

125.7381

0.446701

0.354005

125.6189

126.1848

125.1942- 125.8548

EUR/INR

109.5882

0.198494

-0.1808

109.4432

109.7867

109.1436- 109.6801

USD/JPY

158.584

0.585999

0.368159

159.17

159.17

157.591- 159.529

GBP/USD

1.3514

-0.0013

0.096102

1.3527

1.3527

1.3505- 1.3599

DXY Index

98.101

0.113998

-0.11607

98.19

98.215

98.067- 98.291

JPY/INR

0.5842

-0.0018

0.307167

0.5854

0.586

0.581- 0.586


///                   Sea Cargo News            ///

Iran Announces Alternative Shipping Routes in Strait of Hormuz Amid Mine Threat

Iran on Thursday issued fresh maritime guidance directing vessels to use alternative routes while transiting the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz, citing risks posed by potential sea mines in the main navigation channel.

The advisory, released by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), comes shortly after Tehran agreed to temporarily reopen the vital waterway under a two-week ceasefire arrangement with the United States.

“All ships intending to transit the Strait of Hormuz are hereby notified… to take alternative routes… to ensure maritime safety and avoid possible collisions with sea mines,” the IRGC said in a statement carried by local media. Specific entry and exit coordinates for the alternate passages were also shared with shipping operators.



Global Shipping Order Book Hits 17-Year High Amid Record Tanker Contracting


The global shipping order book has reached a 17-year high at the end of the first quarter of 2026, driven by record crude tanker contracting and sustained newbuilding activity, according to the BIMCO. The total order book stood at 191 million Compensated Gross Tonnes (CGT), representing 17% of the global fleet, the highest ratio since 2011.

The growth reflects strong contracting momentum throughout the 2020s, with the latest surge led by tanker orders. Newbuilding contracting during Q1 2026 increased 40% year-on-year to 17.6 million CGT, supported by a tripling of tanker orders and a recovery in LNG carrier contracting.

Tankers accounted for 32% of total orders, the highest share since 2017. However on a quarterly basis, overall contracting declined 17%, mainly due to a slowdown in dry bulk vessel orders after a spike in late 2025.

Order book-to-fleet ratios have risen significantly across segments, reaching 40% for LNG Carriers, 37% for container vessels, 22% for crude tankers and 19% for product tankers. The increase in tanker orders are expected to support fleet renewal, as a significant portion of the existing fleet is ageing.

Shipbuilding activity remained heavily concentrated in China, with Chinese yards securing 70% of global orders in the first quarter. South Korean shipyards accounted 20%, while Japan’s share dropped to just 1%, its lowest in decades.

Looking ahead, industry analysts caution that expanding order books, high newbuilding prices, long delivery timelines and geopolitical uncertainties could moderate future contracting activity despite the current strong momentum.

Panama Flags China Over Rising Detention of Its Ships Amid Port Dispute


Panama has raised concerns over a recent increase in inspections and detentions of its flag-bearing vessels in Chinese ports, linking the development to a domestic legal dispute involving Hong Kong-based conglomerate CK Hutchison.

Speaking at a conference in Asunción, Panamanian Foreign Minister Javier Martínez-Acha said the spike in detentions followed a January ruling by Panama’s Supreme Court. The court invalidated the legal framework that allowed CK Hutchison’s local unit to operate two key terminals near the Panama Canal, prompting the government to cancel the concessions.

“As a result of the ruling, our commercial shipping fleet — the most important in the world — has seen an increase in inspections and detentions of vessels flying our flag in ports of the People’s Republic of China,” Martínez-Acha said, expressing hope that the situation would soon normalise.


United States Container Traffic Eases as China Exports Slow


Container imports into the United States have shown signs of easing, as a slowdown in export volumes from China begins to weigh on trans-Pacific trade flows. Industry data indicates a decline in inbound container traffic at major US ports, driven largely by weaker shipment volumes from China, the country’s largest trading partner.

The slowdown reflects softer global demand, cautious inventory management by retailers, and ongoing shifts in sourcing strategies. Exporters in China are facing a combination of challenges, including subdued consumer demand in Western markets, pricing pressures, and geopolitical uncertainties. These factors have contributed to reduced order volumes and fewer containerised shipments bound for the United States.

Container Transport in Bangladesh Rises Sharply in 9M FY26


Container transport in Bangladesh recorded a significant upswing during the first nine months of FY2025–26, reflecting improving trade activity and stronger logistics performance across the country’s ports and inland networks.

Industry data indicates a notable increase in container throughput, driven by higher export volumes, particularly in the ready-made garments (RMG) sector, alongside steady import demand for raw materials and consumer goods. The growth underscores Bangladesh’s continued resilience as a key manufacturing and trading hub in South Asia.

Major gateways such as Chittagong Port played a central role in handling the surge, supported by ongoing efficiency improvements, infrastructure upgrades, and better vessel turnaround times. Inland Container Depots (ICD) and multimodal transport systems also contributed to smoother cargo movement across the supply chain.

Analysts note that enhanced connectivity, policy support and increased private sector participation have helped boost containerised trade. However, challenges such as congestion risks, capacity constraints and global shipping uncertainties remain key concerns for sustaining long-term growth.

With container volumes continuing to trend upward, Bangladesh is expected to further strengthen its position in regional and global trade, provided infrastructure expansion and digitalisation efforts keep pace with rising demand.

Why the Iran Crisis Matters Deeply for India – and Why It Chose Not to Mediate


Major importers such as China, India, Japan, and South Korea depend heavily on this route, as do exporters like Saudi Arabia, Iraq, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, and Kuwait. This dual dependency makes disruption systemically consequential.

The crisis is real because risk alone is disruptive. Oil benchmarks such as Brent Crude have risen 3–5% in a single session on escalation signals. War-risk premiums have increased by 30–50%, in some cases reaching 5% of vessel value. Shipping has responded with delays, route reassessments, and reduced exposure.

Tanker traffic dropped sharply, and even post-de-escalation, flows may remain below normal. The consequences ripple quickly. Reduced vessel movement tightens capacity, raises freight costs, and extends transit times, disrupting just-in-time supply chains in sectors like automotive, electronics, and pharmaceuticals.

The impact extends beyond oil and gas. The Gulf is a key supplier of petrochemicals, fertilizers, and critical inputs. Disruptions from producers in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates can raise global polymer prices, strain fertilizer supply, and impact agriculture. Qatar’s role in helium exports further links the crisis to semiconductor manufacturing and medical systems in China, Japan, and South Korea.

For India, the macroeconomic impact is direct. With over 85% dependence on crude imports, largely routed through the Strait of Hormuz, price shocks widen the current account deficit, weaken the currency, and fuel inflation.

A USD 10-per-barrel increase can raise the deficit by 0.3–0.4% of GDP, according to some estimates. Higher energy costs cascade across transport, agriculture, and industry, complicating policy for the Reserve Bank of India and pressuring fiscal balances.

The crisis also exposes structural vulnerabilities. India’s LNG, LPG, fertilizers, and petrochemical supply chains are closely tied to the Gulf, making logistics disruptions immediately felt through higher costs and delays.

In response, resilience strategies are diverging. India is focusing on diversification by expanding sourcing, building strategic reserves, investing in renewables, and strengthening multimodal logistics. China is pursuing scale and control through large reserves, overseas assets, and alternative corridors through pipelines and Belt and Road infrastructure. Both these large economies have different paths, with the same objective of reducing exposure to chokepoints.

India’s calibrated geopolitical stance reflects its stakes. The Middle East anchors its energy security, trade, and diaspora interests, while partnerships with Israel strengthen defence and technology ties. Rather than mediate, India is maintaining balance by engaging all sides while prioritizing stability, energy flows, and economic security. Mediation in such conflicts requires leverage typically held by powers like the United States, not a role India seeks to assume.

Critics argue that this crisis was a missed opportunity for India to assert geopolitical influence. However, this underestimates both the complexity of the conflict and the risks of overreach. Effective mediation requires not just intent but leverage, security presence, and acceptance by all parties, a condition India does not yet possess.

More importantly, India’s core interests lie in preserving stability, ensuring energy security, and protecting its economic partnerships across the region, including with Israel, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Iran. Any overt alignment risks undermining this delicate balance; hence, it was a matter of diplomatic maturity that we did not intervene.

India’s restraint, therefore, is not a limitation but a strategic choice. By maintaining multi-alignment and focusing on long-term resilience rather than short-term visibility, India preserves its role as a stable and credible partner across competing blocs.

In an increasingly fragmented global order, this ability to engage all sides while safeguarding national interests represents a form of influence in itself.

Unlike India, Pakistan does not have significant stakes at the economic, social, and strategic levels, does not possess India’s diplomatic stature and soft power, and has little to lose. Moreover, being a fellow Islamic nation, it can actively play a messenger role, which it has done rightly, and there is no sense in comparing with us, who hold a wider global campus

The lesson is clear. The Iran conflict is not just a regional crisis and it is a global supply chain stress test. It demonstrates that in an interconnected world, vulnerability at one chokepoint can reshape trade, costs, and strategy worldwide. For India and others, resilience, diversification, and strategic balance are no longer optional—they are foundational.

New Viking Helix system simplifies ship evacuation at speed

Enabling the controlled ship evacuation of up to 477 persons within 30 minutes into 153-person life rafts alongside, the multiple occupancy Viking Helix slide accommodates adults of all sizes. It also allows adults and children to evacuate together, while even stretchers carrying injured persons can be brought into the continuous flow.

“The Helix solution has been designed for operational speed and simplicity, technical efficiency, while the controlled descent of evacuees means they need less crew assistance transferring from the slide to the life raft,” said Alex Kristensen, VP cruise & ferry, Viking Life-Saving Equipment.

Certified for use by DNV, the Viking Helix supports a wide range of vessel configurations and is especially suited to larger ferries and small to mid-size cruise ships. Installed at heights ranging between 5 and 23 meters, the system requires no welding on the ship side, making integration straightforward into newbuild and retrofit projects.

For heights of up to 12 meters, the Viking Helix features a patent-pending bowsing system which automatically activates cylinders after raft ballast water bags are filled to maintain position manual bowsing. Bowsing line tightening is the failing most frequently reported in evacuation training.

“Automated bowsing allows the Helix MES to work with trim and list in a working range of 4-29 meters, so that fast and safe evacuation goes ahead even in challenging conditions,” said Kristensen. “Users also avoid the service time and cost needed to reinstall bowsing systems every three years when systems are deployed – as required by SOLAS.”

Harbor trials at the Viking Testing Center, Esbjerg, Denmark, focused on materials, structural integrity and system behavior, with volunteers of different ages and physical conditions moving through the slide and boarding life rafts. Subsequent heavy-weather sea trials in the North Sea verified performance in waters where wind, waves and motions tested the slide’s movement with a vessel and control over evacuee descent in changing trim and list conditions.

Minimized operational disruption is also designed in to a system which requires service at an authorized service station once every 30 months. “One Helix slide and a 153-person life raft are housed in an enclosed GRP frame which fits into the standard height between two decks and is removed as one unit,” said Kristensen. “Switch-out is straightforward, even during short port stays.” 

Singapore's Straight Talking on Strait Blockade


Another busy day in the Straits of Malacca and Singapore (Pole Star Global) Singapore’s Foreign Affairs Minister Vivian Balakrishnan has outlined to the parliament in Singapore why his country strongly supports the global status quo position that nations bordering straits should not hamper transit passage even through territorial waters, nor charge transit fees.

In a particularly powerful speech, given Singapore’s respected and even-handed position globally, he noted that more oil and containers passed through the Strait of Malacca than through the Strait of Hormuz. At its narrowest, the Strait of Malacca is only 2 nautical miles wide. But even so, it was not in Singapore’s interest to capitalize on this geography; this would backfire, and it was in Singapore’s interest, as an entrepôt, that the international consensus on the matter be maintained.

Otherwise, reprisal and reciprocal tolls and transit frees would disrupt global shipping, on which the world heavily depends for everyday survivability and prosperity. If one nation started charging tolls, others would follow suit – at Gibraltar, the English Channel, the Øresund, the Kuril chain, the Magellan passage – and there would be no end to where tolls could be charged. Toll gates would be further and further widened, and in the end the whole world would suffer by the limitations on free movement of goods.

Minister Balakrishnan observed that freedom of transit passage was guaranteed by Article 44 of UNCLOS, and could not be suspended for any reason, even in wartime. Even if states had not ratified UNCLOS, freedom of transit passage was historically well-established and part of customary international law.

The minister also reported to parliament that he had been in contact with his opposite number in Iran, and had told him that there were to be no bilateral discussions on the subject of restricting innocent passage movements. Singapore would not enter into or be part of any negotiation in which the question of charging tolls for transit passage was considered, and strongly supported the International Maritime Organization position on the subject.

If Singapore’s position based on principles were translated to the Strait of Hormuz, then Iranian action in recent weeks certainly contravenes Article 44 of UNCLOS. But an American plan to interdict Iranian ships and ports would not contradict Article 44 provided it was achieved by means other than blocking the Strait of Hormuz – for example, by intercepting Iranians ships on the high seas, where other provisions of UNCLOS might well apply.

///                   Air Cargo News            ///

EU airports face jet fuel shortage unless Strait of Hormuz reopens

                         Image: © Jaromir Chalabala/ Shutterstock

European Union airports could start running out of jet fuel in the coming weeks unless the Strait of Hormuz opens soon.

In a letter to the European Union, industry association Airports Council International (ACI) said that its members are increasingly concerned about jet fuel availability.

ACI pointed out that the summer tourist season would soon be getting underway, which would see a rise in demand for jet fuel and increase pressure.

In the letter, first reported by the Financial Times, ACI director Olivier Jankovec said that if the passage through the Strait of Hormuz does not resume in “any significant and stable way within the next three weeks” a systemic jet fuel shortage is set to become a reality for the European Union.

Any jet fuel shortage would “severely disrupt airport operations and air connectivity”. The warning comes as the Strait of Hormuz has been largely closed to commercial shipping since the outbreak of the US/Israel-Iran war.

This closure has resulted in fuel constraints as around 20-25% of the world’s supply of oil transits the maritime chokepoint. The capacity constraint has pushed up fuel prices and IATA/Platts figures show that the average price of jet fuel has risen from around $100 per barrel in February to just under $200 last week.

The rising cost of jet fuel is also expected to contribute to increases in airfreight rates over the coming weeks as transport operations become more expensive. To help manage the situation, ACI has called for the creation of an EU monitoring platform to help coordinate the response and map availability.

The organisation would also like to see imports from alternative locations and joint procurement across member states. “It is essential that the European Commission conducts such mapping/assessment and monitoring,” said Jankovec in the letter.

ACI would like the mapping to cover current and projected jet fuel availability and needs; Identification of alternative imports and measures that can be taken to increase production/refining within the EU; Monitoring of potential threats to Intra-EU flows of jet fuel from EU refineries and import hubs; and assessment of commercial and strategic reserve levels, possible timeline for their use and destination of such use.

ACI also called for the lifting of restrictions and regulatory constraints that limit the ability to import jet fuel.

Jankovec said the situation had also highlighted the vulnerability of the EU’s jet fuel supplies.

This crisis has exposed the reduced refining capacity of the EU for jet fuel production, and its acute dependence on imports from other World regions,” he wrote.  “This situation needs to be addressed as a priority as part of the EU’s strategic autonomy agenda.

“Safeguarding and future-proofing air connectivity requires an EU plan to recover and develop refining capacity for jet fuel, along and in parallel with more effective support for the production and affordability of SAF as per the EU mandates set by the RefuelEU Regulation.”

Lufthansa Cargo hopes to operate two thirds of flights despite strikes

                                              Image: © Lufthansa

Lufthansa Cargo is hoping to operate around two-thirds of its flights during a two-day pilot strike that started on 13 April.

The Vereinigung Cockpit (VC) pilot union strike action affects pilots working for Lufthansa Cargo, Lufthansa Airlines and Lufthansa CityLine taking part.

However, in a statement, Lufthansa Cargo said that it was able to utilise partner airline aircraft to keep disruption to a minimum.

“Due to short-notice adjustments and flexible solutions, e.g. operating some routes with AeroLogic aircraft and crews or rescheduling some flights, we can operate up to two-thirds of our regular freighter operations,” the airline said in a statement to Air Cargo News.

In addition to its own freighters, Lufthansa Cargo markets the freight capacity of Lufthansa Group passenger airlines. Lufthansa Group airlines such as Austrian Airlines, SWISS, Brussels Airlines, Air Dolomiti, and ITA Airways will also attempt to offer additional frequencies and deploy larger aircraft on their flights to and from Germany.

Meanwhile, the carrier’s joint venture partners, Cathay Pacific and United Airlines, are also operating as scheduled.

“Nevertheless, we had to cancel several flights and regret the impact on our customers, with whom we maintain trusted partnerships and who rely on our reliable transport solutions,” Lufthansa Cargo said.

“At the same time, we are doing everything possible to maintain stable services for our customers and to keep critical supply chains moving as smoothly as possible.”

The strike, which was due to end at midnight on 14 April, was announced by the Vereinigung Cockpit (VC) union on April 11 over ongoing contract negotiations and pension provisions.

“Vereinigung Cockpit feels compelled to take this step after the employers’ side shows no discernible will to find a solution in several collective bargaining disputes,” said VC President Andreas Pinheiro.

“Despite a deliberate renunciation of strike action over the Easter holidays, there were no serious offers. During this time, there was neither a reaction nor a recognisable willingness to talk on the part of the employers.”

The airline has implemented a transit embargo at its Frankfurt hub covering certain animal and emergency shipments. Meanwhile, at the Munich hub, there is a transit embargo for all live animals as well as certain other sensitive shipments.

The carrier said that all Lufthansa Cargo flights scheduled to arrive in Frankfurt on April 13 are planned to operate as scheduled.

Mexico: Cargo thefts drop drastically in some regions

The theft of cargo shipments, including the hijacking of entire trucks, is a well-known scourge in Mexico. But the good news is that in most parts of the country, the number of cargo thefts has been declining sharply for months. This was triggered by the new Balam strategy introduced by the Sheinbaum government. However, Mexico City’s metropolitan area remains a criminal hotspot despite targeted government countermeasures.

NG Commander Hernán Cortés informed media about the latest drop of cargo thefts in major Mexican states – photo: gobierno de México

Despite this fact, the key message delivered during the press briefing was that twelve of the 31 Mexican states selected by the government for fighting crime in the transportation sector, have achieved significantly better security figures compared to a year before. The scheme, announced a year ago by President Claudia Sheinbaum, bundles regional and national security efforts to combat cargo thefts targeting transport operators in Mexico.

Balam strategy works
National Guard commander, Hernán Cortés Hernández, who now presented the first results of the strategy to the press, stated that over the past seven months, theft has been reduced by 28% in 12 Mexican states, and the recovery of cargo vehicles has increased by 24%, compared to the same period last year.

According to Señor Cortés, the core elements of the Balam Strategy are as follows:

Increased personnel and technical resources for highway units, to boost on-the-spot inspections and patrols on vulnerable stretches of the transnational road network, such as between Mexico City and Puebla.

The establishment of field companies that serve as rapid-response forces in the event of incidents.

Increased deployment of manned and unmanned aircraft conducting reconnaissance missions and gathering intelligence.

Centralization of data to track criminal activities and their initiators and masterminds.

The Balam Strategy is rounded off by the deployment of 1,241 specialists, 23 investigative units, and the provision of 532 vehicles, 4 helicopters, and 37 drones.

In a nutshell: It is a data-driven, cross-provincial network of security experts who have been equipped, technically and operationally, by the central government, in accordance with their respective missions and tasks.

Alerts via app
Hernán Cortés, who presented the interim results of the Balam scheme, illustrated that its core component is a command-and-control center, where incidents are monitored and responses are coordinated. Truck drivers can send alerts via an App on their cell phones, this way transmitting geolocation data directly to authorities.

This activates highway patrol units closest to the incident to intervene immediately, supported by GPS-equipped vehicles and aerial surveillance capabilities. Monitoring centers operated by logistics companies also have become part of the Balam security network by continuously updating coordinates of their vehicles and sharing incident reports with authorities real-time.

Dark spots remain
However, despite these security improvements, cargo theft remains highly concentrated in specific regions, particularly in Mexico City’s metropolitan region or along the routes to Felipe Angeles International Airport. Industry associations speak of critical last-mile corridors. This is confirmed by authorities that emphasize the necessity of targeted counter measures in the capital area.

Despite the regionally improved security regime, incidents continue to occur daily, indicating persistent exposure. Transport operators still face an average of up to three assaults each day.

Officials of the Mexican Association of Private Security and Satellite Industry Companies, speak of USD 386 million in annual losses caused by cargo theft across the state. These are provoked by structural and external factors such as cybercrime, social erosion, hijacking of vehicles, drug trafficking and organized crime activity.

Campbell Wilson leaves Air India

Following IndiGo’s CEO, Pieter Elbers recent resignation, the next helmsman of an Indian carrier has quit his job: New Zealand-native Campbell Wilson. He steps down from his post at Delhi-based Air India after accomplishing the privatization and merger of four airlines under Tata ownership.  Wilson will remain in office until a successor has been appointed by the supervisory board.

      Campbell Wilson, outgoing CEO of Air India. Photo: courtesy of Air India

His decision does not come as a surprise, as the executive had previously announced his intention to step down in 2024 but remained in charge of ensuring a seamless transition of leadership: Wilson was appointed in 2022 after the Tata Group took over the loss‑making Indian flag carrier.

During his tenure, the merger of four airlines (Air India, Air India Express, Vistara, and AIX Connect) was executed, streamlining different work cultures rooted in public and private sectors.

A multitude of challenges
Since the privatization of Air India in 2022, the Tata conglomerate has embarked on an ambitious fleet overhaul, ordering hundreds of aircraft to replace ageing and fuel-thirsty jetliners. Simultaneously, the intercontinental network was expanded.

Wilson led efforts to improve passenger and cargo services, modernize operations and integrate the group’s aviation businesses, but faced persistent headwinds, including aircraft delivery delays, airspace closures caused by the 2025 India‑Pakistan conflict, and disruptions linked to the war in the Middle East and Iran, causing widespread airspace closures that required longer flights on alternative routes.

Wilson’s most severe setback during his tenure came in JUN2025, when Air India Flight AI171, bound for London Gatwick, crashed right after takeoff from Ahmedabad Airport (IATA: AMD), killing all but one of the 242 people on board and 19 people on the ground. This fatal crash marked the first total loss of a Boeing 787-8 (Dreamliner) worldwide, bringing the carrier’s maintenance and safety schemes under scrutiny at a time of accelerated growth.

Leaving the red remains the primary goal
Following the Ahmedabad crash, Air India strengthened its Safety Management System (SMS), upped its investment in technical infrastructure, and revised crew training and fatigue management. In the meantime, the airline is building an MRO facility and a training academy equipped with simulators for the Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 long-haul variants to manage the delivery of 570 Boeing and Airbus aircraft as part of its five year long transformational plan, with first deliveries taking place in 2027.

Campbell’s successor, whoever that may be, is likely to be judged primarily on the airline’s financial recovery. After all, the Indian flag carrier continues to incur significant losses. Improving the reputation of the company, which has been tarnished by numerous complaints about poor service, also remains a constant concern.

Kales pacts with Alaska Cargo

Amsterdam-based GSSA, Kales Airline Services, has gained Alaska Airlines and its group member, Hawaiian Airlines, as a new client. The Seattle-headquartered carrier (IATA code: AS) is the 6th largest U.S. airline and is about to serve transatlantic routes for the very first time since its founding 94 years ago. Rome and London are the two new European destinations listed on the carrier’s flight plan.

In its announcement, Alaska states that it intends to operate a brand new B787 on the two new routes. The Boeing long-haul passenger aircraft can carry between 15 and 20 tons of cargo per flight in its lower deck compartments, depending on passenger baggage volumes. The air cargo industry will have daily access to both intercontinental flights, to and from Seattle.

Alaska’s first 787 widebody aircraft in the carrier’s new global livery will be seen operating across Europe and Asia.

Daily flights
Services between Seattle and Rome are set to commence on 29APR26, with Seattle- London offered as of 21MAY26. While Kales will manage the cargo business at Rome Fiumicino itself, in the UK, Alaska Airlines will be represented by Wexco, a fully owned subsidiary of the Kales Group. The Kales Group will also expand its network offerings with Alaska Airlines in important offline markets such as Turkey and India.

In a statement, Kales CEO, Sebastiaan Scholte not only highlights the importance of the new transatlantic routes for his company’s cargo clients but also hails Alaska Airlines’ extensive network beyond its main gateway, Seattle. The network is widespread in the greater Pacific region, hence attractive to European shippers and forwarding agents alike. 

“This exciting new cooperation with Alaska and Hawaiian enables our group to significantly expand our network. It allows us to offer our customers more destinations, not only across North America, but also onward connections to the Far East and Australia,” illustrates Scholte.

Nearly 100% capacity utilization
On the westbound routes, he expects a stable product mix consisting of machinery parts, garments, luxury items, instruments, and perishables. Chemical products, automotive, aircraft parts, and household goods are likely to round off the airfreighted goods. 

“We anticipate nearly 100% capacity utilization on both westbound routes,” said Scholte. With Seattle and neighboring Vancouver, Canada, there are two economic hubs with high purchasing power. Furthermore, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport is excellently connected to the trucking network along the U.S. West Coast.

AS is responsible for eastbound cargo
Ian Morgan, VP of Cargo at Alaska Airlines, is also convinced that a fruitful partnership between his airline and the Dutch GSSA will benefit both parties: “Having Kales represent Alaska Airlines in these new markets, will provide our customers a seamless experience when working with us. Kales and Alaska share a dedication to high quality service and will be strong partners as we grow in Europe.” On its eastbound flights to Rome and London, Alaska Cargo will manage the pallet and container operations on its own.

In addition to the extensive domestic U.S. network, Alaska and Hawaiian Air Cargo serve 14 destinations across the Far East, the South Pacific, Canada, and Mexico from its global gateways in Seattle (SEA) and Honolulu (HNL).

Asked whether the two transatlantic flights were part of a larger network expansion plan by Alaska Airlines, linking the U.S. Westcoast with Europe, Scholte said that this had not been discussed between Kales and the airline. “Our counterparts did not present us any plans in this regard.”

Cargo data in a broken world: Information is crucial

Air cargo is being hit from three sides at once: capacity is collapsing, costs are rising, and demand is turning unpredictable. Jet fuel prices have surged from roughly USD 90 to nearly USD 200 per barrel at peak levels, forcing airlines to raise fuel surcharges by as much as 34% in some cases.

The conflict in the Middle East has disrupted operations through airspace closures, grounded fleets, and rising fuel and insurance costs, while demand volatility adds further pressure. Real-time visibility is still missing – and in a market like this, flying blind comes at a cost. Information is now the single, most important advantage.

COVID crisis revival
Six years ago, the aviation industry faced what many believed would be its worst crisis. Airlines entered survival mode, with many forced into restructuring under Chapter 11, triggering longer sales cycles, more complex negotiations, and a sharp increase in stakeholder involvement.

During that period, airlines rapidly repurposed passenger aircraft for cargo operations – so-called preighters – in many cases removing seats to increase capacity. Carriers such as Turkish Airlines and Ethiopian Airlines were among the early adopters, with both emerging as clear winners as cargo operations offset losses in passenger traffic.

Teruel Airport in eastern Spain, a state-owned facility known as one of Europe’s largest aircraft maintenance and storage sites, company courtesy

Not all carriers survived – but those that did, emerged stronger and, in many cases, more profitable than before. Today, the industry faces a different kind of disruption, and the question is no longer whether pressure will build, but how the market will respond – and where the opportunity lies.

Lower capacity
The conflict involving the United States, Israel, and Iran, has led to targeted disruptions across key Gulf hubs, including Abu Dhabi, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Dubai, with airports and surrounding airspace still affected. These closures are directly constraining cargo flows to and from the region, with air freight experiencing the most immediate impact among all transport modes. Global air cargo capacity has dropped by roughly 22%, with Asia–Europe corridors via the Middle East down nearly 40% (Reuters).

At the same time, Emirates, Qatar Airways, and Etihad handle a significant share of global air cargo flows, with the Middle East region accounting for roughly 13% of global air cargo traffic (IATA), and a large portion of China–Europe traffic moving through their hubs. Even short-term movements have seen rates jump 5–6% within days on disrupted lanes. Their reduced operations have created a substantial capacity gap, pushing rates sharply higher across major trade corridors.

Where are the planes?
As operations contract, aircraft are not disappearing – they are being repositioned. Some airlines have moved planes to safer regions, while others have kept them parked in secondary airports or abroad to reduce risk exposure.  According to flight-tracking data from Flightradar24, around 20 Qatar Airways aircraft have been relocated to Teruel Airport in eastern Spain, a state-owned facility known as one of Europe’s largest aircraft maintenance and storage sites.

Around 20 QR aircraft have been relocated to Teruel because Gulf airlines report a drastic drop in pax demand due to the war in the Middle East – Credit: QR

Teruel is a remote airport in rural Spain, which previously served as a major parking facility for grounded aircraft during the COVID-19 pandemic, when it hosted around 140 planes, according to Reuters. The move reflects the airline’s reduced flying schedule, with fewer aircraft needed as airspace restrictions limit operations from its hub in Doha.

Emirates did not move everything to one storage location. Instead, planes remain distributed across its network footprint, with many stranded globally, avoiding fleet concentration in a single high-risk location. On the other hand, Etihad keeps its planes closer to home, with most of its fleet parked in Abu Dhabi and a second cluster in Asia.

European key players – Lufthansa, Air France-KLM, and British Airways – after cutting or suspending Middle East routes, are redeploying capacity toward Asia as rising fuel costs and airspace disruptions force network adjustments. In the U.S., capacity cuts are not showing as long-term parked aircraft but rather as what can be described as ‘soft grounding’, with reduced utilization and fewer rotations.

As a result, a large portion of the global fleet is either idle, underused, or mispositioned as capacity cuts of over 20% ripple through the system.

Disrupted intelligence
Right now, nobody in air cargo has a reliable real-time picture of which flights are actually operating, where capacity is available, which routes are at risk, or how prices are moving. Decisions are still being made based on outdated schedules – and sometimes on gut feeling.

The network becomes chaotic and reactive. Shipments sit at origin, get rolled last minute, or miss connections entirely. Ground handling teams are overwhelmed by unpredictable volumes, while capacity is either wasted or unavailable where it is needed most. Paradoxically, global cargo demand is still growing – up 5.6% year-on-year in early 2026 – while capacity is lagging behind at just 3.6% (IATA). Constant rebooking turns operations into firefighting.

Current data sources include Automatic Dependent Surveillance–Broadcast (ADS-B) flight tracking, NOTAMs (airspace restrictions), airline schedule changes, and unofficial airport congestion signals. What matters is not more data, but the ability to act on it.

Forwarders and airlines need to know which routes are about to fail, which lanes remain stable, and when to shift capacity before disruption hits. The advantage lies in deciding – early and with confidence – where to route cargo, which carrier to trust, and when to avoid a corridor entirely.

Even the major booking platforms – cargo.one, CargoAi, and WebCargo by Freightos – have digitized booking and rate aggregation, but they still lack predictive disruption intelligence and do not show, in real time, which carriers are actually operating reliably or where capacity is truly available.

Routing optimization engine
The gap between quoted rates, booked rates, and actual executed rates is widening with rate movements of up to 70% on key lanes within weeks, making static pricing models increasingly unreliable. What is missing, is a system that can show the true market price – per lane, per day – along with price trends and airline price differences.

The highest leverage right now, lies in the ability to predict airspace closures, congestion spikes, and route instability. Traditional routes are broken, yet many still operate within outdated lane structures.

A system capable of suggesting alternative routings, including hybrid solutions such as air+truck or sea-air, would add immediate operational value. What is needed is a ‘Bloomberg terminal’ for air cargo – replacing long-term contracts with dynamic decision-making tools that reflect the reality of volatile markets.

The missing layer
Today, most companies have data, but they neither share it nor monetize it effectively.

Pricing data sits in one system. Capacity signals in another. Disruption indicators are scattered across tracking feeds, NOTAMs, and operational updates. None of it connects fast enough to be useful.

Systems capable of delivering pricing intelligence, capacity reliability scoring, and disruption prediction – answering the question ‘what should I do now?’ – are still missing.

In a world of continuous disruption, the model itself needs to change. How data is collected, shared, and monetized will define the next phase of the industry and who captures the value.

This is the moment to rethink how data is shared in air cargo, not as isolated datasets, but as a real-time decision layer.

In an industry that moves roughly one-third of global trade by value, even small informational advantages translate into significant financial impact. The next winners won’t control aircraft. They’ll control information – and act on it faster than everyone else.

I hope you have enjoyed reading the above news letter.                                                    

Robert Sands

Joint Managing Director

Jupiter Sea & Air Services Pvt Ltd

Casa Blanca, 3rd Floor

11, Casa Major Road, Egmore

Chennai – 600 008. India.

GST Number : 33AAACJ2686E1ZS.

Tel : + 91 44 2819 0171 / 3734 / 4041

Fax : + 91 44 2819 0735

Mobile : + 91 98407 85202

E-mail : robert.sands@jupiterseaair.co.in

Website : www.jupiterseaair.com 1Branches  : Chennai, Bangalore, Mumbai, Coimbatore, Tirupur and Tuticorin.

Associate Offices : New Delhi, Kolkatta, Cochin & Hyderabad.

 

Thanks  to  :  Container  News,  Indian Seatrade, Cargo Forwarder Global  &  Air Cargo News.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog